What's Hot
What's Going On

Calendar

Search thousands of events in our database.

Restaurants

Search hundreds of restaurants in our database.

Nightlife

Search hundreds of clubs in our database.

loading...

OW on Twitter
OW on Facebook
Print Email

NEWS

Poison in the well

The EPA’s investigation of a toxic site in Parramore took two decades. How many more will it take to clean it up?

Photo: Shan Stumpf, License: N/A

Shan Stumpf

Gray matter: The map shows the location of the former Orlando Gasification Plant; the shaded portion indicates area affected by underground pollution


Today, the majority of the Orlando site is a fenced-in equipment stockyard for Teco Energy, a company that distributes natural gas in Central Florida. The EPA has named Teco, along with Progress Energy, the Atlanta Gas Light Company and the City of Orlando, as one of the “potentially responsible parties” for the pollution, so the company will likely foot part of the bill for the investigation and remediation of the site, which could easily reach millions of dollars. The Teco property adjoins the railroad tracks that, a century earlier, brought carloads of coal to be shoveled into generators where it was heated to produce gas. From 1888 to 1960, gas manufactured at the Orlando plant provided heat and light for thousands.

“There’s nothing spectacular about gas,” an article about the plant that appeared in the April 1923 edition of Orlando Magazine said. “[But] if you were to see the process by which it is evolved … you’d have greater respect for that tiny little flame which is only waiting for you to touch a match to it.”

Today, however, that process is associated less with human ingenuity and more with the toxic byproducts that outlive the plants that produce gas. Over the years, rains and flooding spread chemical wastes off the property and into antiquated drainage wells drilled into the Upper Floridan aquifer. (Modern drainage systems, by contrast, direct runoff to rivers, lakes, shallow “surficial” aquifers or water treatment plants.) Bradner presumed this is why she found a “hydrocarbon plume” – a vast swath of water polluted with coal-tar compounds such as benzene and flourene – in the Upper Floridan aquifer, measuring about a mile long and a half-mile wide, directly beneath the former plant. The plume has crept slightly northeast in the past 20 years, says Robenson Joseph, the EPA’s man in charge of overseeing the Orlando site, but is still essentially the same size, and in the same place, as it was when discovered more than two decades ago.

According to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the rock that separates the city’s source of drinking water in the deep Lower Floridan aquifer keeps the pollution from the Upper aquifer from reaching it. Though Orange County draws much of its water from the Upper Floridan aquifer, hydrologists say the pollution in the plume is not likely to move laterally.

“With these types of cleanup sites, we are well aware of the wells in the area, and we’re certainly sure to monitor those more closely,” says Florida Department of Environmental Protection spokeswoman Lisa Kelley.

Bill Belleville, a local author who special-
izes in nature and conservation, isn’t convinced that polluted water will stay in one place. “Mixing of water can and does happen via fractures and fissures,” he wrote in an e-mail to the Weekly. “If you look at the analysis of individual springs in the [area], you’ll see that this mixing will occur more often than suspected.”

Joseph would not comment on how the agency will address the pollution in the 
aquifer, calling any comment before a 
March feasibility study is complete “wild speculation.”

In her 1989 report on the plume, however, Bradner offers a sobering suggestion: Dilute the pollution in the water to acceptable levels. According to retired U.S. Geological Survey geologist Tom Haltom, who has observed the Air Force extracting its own hydrocarbon plume from an aquifer under Sacramento, Calif., for the last decade and a half, that’s still the best option – unfortunately. He says dilution is a crude and laborious process that never fully rids the aquifer of pollutants. “Pulling the water out, filtering it, putting it back in, filtering it again – you have to do that for a heck of a long time,” he says.

We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus