Happytown: State House wants to block sick-time ordinances
Florida House votes in favor of bill that would pre-empt sick time ordinances by invalidating them before they pass at local level
Published: April 10, 2013
ESTIMATED COST TO THE NATIONAL ECONOMY WHEN PEOPLE SHOW UP TO WORK SICK; 40 MILLION AMERICAN WORKERS HAVE NO ACCESS TO SICK TIME
NATIONAL PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR A LAW GUARANTEEING A MINIMUM NUMBER OF PAID SICK DAYS FOR EMPLOYEES
NUMBER OF COUNTIES IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONSIDERING AN EARNED SICK-TIME ORDINANCE (ORANGE COUNTY), PROMPTING THE FLORIDA HOUSE TO PASS A STATEWIDE PRE-EMPTION BILL, HB 655, ON APRIL 4
“YOU’RE ABUSING THE PROCESS HERE. … THE ONLY REASON YOU’RE DOING IT IS BECAUSE YOU CAN. APPARENTLY WHAT WE ARE DOING RIGHT NOW IS SAYING THAT ALL POLITICS IS NOT LOCAL.”
– REP. JIM WALDMAN, D-COCONUT CREEK, ON THE HOUSE FLOOR
SOURCES: National Partnership for Women and Families, myfloridahouse.gov
Ever since last year’s Orange County imbroglio, in which the County Commission ignored more than 50,000 local petitions asking the county to put an earned sick-time initiative on the ballot, the writing has been on the wall – and sometimes on the tablet or smart phone. Chambercrats in Tallahassee were going to deliver the “kill shot” to prevent any such popular uprising from ever happening again (partially, perhaps, because local leaders would likely be too busy defending their poor texting habits in court). Hell, even Mayor Teresa Jacobs delivered a cleverly choreographed olive-branch dance (following a court order) indicating that the sick-time measure would finally make it onto the county’s primary ballot in August 2014, even though she supported the pre-emptive House Bill 655 and its author, state Rep. Steve Precourt, R-Orlando, which would have prevented counties from passing such ordinances in the first place.
On April 4, in an absurd bit of political theater, the Florida House of Representatives approved the pre-emption bill by a margin of 75-43. During floor debate, Republicans argued against something that wasn’t even happening – a statewide sick-time measure – leaving most of them looking like wealthy dogs chasing their nonexistent tails. When they weren’t doing that, they were arguing against a “patchwork” of municipal regulations that would be confusing to “small businesses.” In other words, they were railing against home rule, something that several Democrats called them on, considering that many of the politicians grew their political legs while serving in municipal offices. How soon they forget!
That collective amnesia, however, isn’t any kind of excuse, nor is it necessarily true. As the folks at the Center for Media and Democracy pointed out in a Huffington Post piece on April 3, the bones of the pre-emption bill came from our friends at the American Legislative Exchange Council, a nefarious conservative modeling (or model bill) agency funded by the people who make their money off the sweaty backs of those who flip burgers for cheap. Precourt, naturally, attended one of ALEC’s hate retreats in 2011 where he must have seen the pre-emption legislation that ALEC borrowed from cuddly Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker. Pepper that with a little bit of financial pressure (and lobbying) from the chamber of commerce, Darden Restaurants and Disney – outspoken foes of the local ordinance last year – throw in some malfeasance from county commissioners like Ted Edwards (“The legislature can deliver the kill shot,” Edwards texted during the September county meeting last year), and throw it under the heating lamp. Boom, legislation.
> Email Billy Manes