What's Hot
What's Going On


Search thousands of events in our database.


Search hundreds of restaurants in our database.


Search hundreds of clubs in our database.


OW on Twitter
OW on Facebook
Print Email



Just like you, beleaguered television viewer with your eyes crossed at the incessant parade of political noise bom-barding your brain, we are so ready for this election cycle to be over.

Photo: , License: N/A

No. 4: Yes

What’s confusing about this amendment initiative is that most of those coming out against it are the same folks who want to kill Washington (i.e., the Chamber of Commerce). It can be argued either way whether changes to comprehensive land-use agreements coming up for public referendum will clog the system (not likely), but we’re all for trying it out. Power to the people, right? Hear that, Tea Party?

No. 5 & No.6: Yes

We’re all for minority representation, but we’re not huge fans of the whole ends-justifying-means philosophy. Meaning that the gerrymandering – drawing legislative district boundaries around ethnically and ideologically homogenous blocs –­ has to stop.

No. 8: No

Supporters of this measure (including for-profit education companies), say money spent to keep class size in control would be better spent giving teachers pay raises; we don’t care how much you pay a teacher, it’s not going to make it easier to do the job if you overload the classroom with more students than one teacher can reasonably tend to.

We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus