What's Hot
MOST READ
What's Going On

Calendar

Search thousands of events in our database.

Restaurants

Search hundreds of restaurants in our database.

Nightlife

Search hundreds of clubs in our database.

Orlando Daily Deals powered by ReferLocal

OW on Twitter
OW on Facebook
Print Email

Music

‘Electric Peace’ reveals how Rick Rubin altered the rock trajectory of the Cult

Album review: The Cult’s ‘Electric Piece’

Photo: N/A, License: N/A


Lots of musicians come to forks in their creative careers, where they are forced to (or choose to) develop into something that may or may not resemble their past selves. Deciding whether to continue and evolve an early persona – what some may consider the “true” artistic heart of an artist – or to shed everything that came before and opt for a new approach altogether – experimentation that some may consider the mark of a “true” artist – is a choice that almost all musicians make at some point. They are either the Consistents (see: Springsteen, Green Day, James Brown) or they are the Changelings (see: Bowie, Joni Mitchell, Prince).

Or they are the Cult.

For the last 20-plus years, the band has held onto a somewhat justified reputation as purveyors first-class of lunkheaded rock & roll for the Ed Hardy set, despite the fact that, for those same 20-plus years, the Cult has tinkered considerably with their exact formulation of douchebaggery-to-brilliance. (For the record, the Cult's more execrable moments are almost completely forgiveable because band principals Ian Astbury and Billy Duffy are true believers in the life-affirming power of capital-R Rock & Roll, so their occasional – okay, semi-frequent – flights into ridiculousness are rooted in a sort of dumb honesty that's deeply admirable.)    

But that wasn’t always the band’s reputation. In its earliest incarnation (as Southern Death Cult, then, later as Death Cult), it was a taut, aggressive, post-punk outlet for Astbury’s fascination with Native American culture and Duffy's wiry, reverb-drenched guitars. As the two got a little older (and shuffled through a few bandmates), their sound got a little more sophisticated, and their Dreamtime album (their first as the Cult) split the difference between the then-dying sound of percussive, Thatcherite post-punk and the then-emerging Paisleyana jangle of British neo-psych-pop.

In 1985, the Cult released Love, a natural progression from Dreamtime that shed the post-punk posturing and then swaddled Astbury in gauzy scarves, neo-hippy garb and brilliantly dumb lyrics about phoenixes, Native American totems and rain-as-a-metaphor-for-orgasm ... all while Duffy and the band hammered out a perversely muscular open-chord attack that melded hard-rock bombast with Beatles homage. The album was hugely successful in Britain and Europe and broke the band through to college-radio audiences in the U.S. It was the beginning of big things for the band, so when it came time for the Cult to record Love’s follow-up, they smartly decided to continue evolving; if Dreamtime-to-Love yielded such strong results, just imagine what Love-to-third-album would do.

The band hunkered down in the Manor Studios with producer Steve Brown (who also worked on Love) with a clutch of songs like “Love Removal Machine,” “Peace Dog,” “Electric Ocean” and “Zap City” that amplified everything that was great about Love, most notably the faintly ridiculous lyrics and the uniquely Cult-like blend of rock & roll brawn and studio-as-instrument production decisions. An 11-track album was recorded, mixed, sequenced and mastered. It was called Peace and it was fantastic.

We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus