What's Hot
What's Going On

Calendar

Search thousands of events in our database.

Restaurants

Search hundreds of restaurants in our database.

Nightlife

Search hundreds of clubs in our database.

loading...

OW on Twitter
OW on Facebook
Print Email

Film & DVD

Don’t write off ‘The Lone Ranger’

Retelling of old Western makes for the least serious, most intellingent action move of the year

Photo: , License: N/A


The Lone Ranger
★★★★ (out of 5 stars)

The cinema snobs scoffed, the industry folks couldn’t raise their eyebrows any higher, and the politically correct sharpened their spears. As for me, I couldn’t be more excited about The Lone Ranger, out this Wednesday. What can I say? I love a good, old-fashioned Western, and this one delivers.

Some may see the semi-reunion of the Pirates of the Caribbean crew as tiresome – the movie reconnected director Gore Verbinski, producer Jerry Bruckheimer, writers Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio, and co-star Johnny Depp – but the powerhouse brings the same madcap elation to a once-spent genre that made the original Pirates such an unexpected, entertaining blockbuster. In some ways, The Lone Ranger benefited from its infamous near-shutdown over budget concerns. A scaled-back production meant losing bizarro special effects like supernatural coyotes, and the installation of Revolutionary Road screenwriter Justin Haythe helped to further ground the script. I could never take seriously concerns that this film would continue to toe the television show’s assumed racist line because, these days, even a whiff of racism is not only bad for reviews, it’s bad for business, too. Just ask Paula Deen.

Right off the bat The Lone Ranger addresses the complex issues surrounding the historical treatment of Native Americans in pop culture by playfully having Depp’s Tonto pose in the “Noble Savage” area of a Wild West sideshow, years past his crime-fighting prime. Tonto narrates the film, albeit from an increasingly unreliable perspective. As expected, Depp provides most of the film’s belly laughs as an unflappable, deeply weird Comanche with an equally immutable (because it’s dead) crow on his head.

Another blessing in disguise for the film is that in its long march from conception (2007) to release, it missed the sweeping trend of portraying action heroes as navel-gazing sadfaces. This Lone Ranger (Armie Hammer) has a reason to despise the cannibalistic and greedy villains, sure, but he’s free of boiling rage and existential terror; instead, he’s got an easy-going charm. Many of the film’s best jokes come at the Lone Ranger’s expense. That doesn’t mean he’s a total idiot, however.

As John Reid, Hammer is at first a stuffed shirt, waving around John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government (which, maybe I’m reading too much into it, sets forth the Lockean arguments against slavery and most “rights of conquerors”) as he heads back to his hometown to serve as district attorney on some sandy Texas plain. He loves the law, maybe a little too much, and refuses to use a gun for most of the film.

Tonto, however, doesn’t share this blind allegiance to the white man’s easily corruptible code, a source of frustration for both when they team up to track down a true baddie, Butch Cavendish (played by an unrecognizable, grimy William Fichtner), who grievously offends both the masked man and his faithful sidekick. Cavendish is not only a criminal by Reid’s terms, he’s also symbolic of an evil so foul it can throw the entire natural order out of whack, according to Tonto. We see this not only in random, carnivorous bunnies, but also in a brewing war between white settlers and Comanche Indians, despite previously respected treaties. Trying to avenge his family without resorting to vengeance, Reid finds himself an outlaw for sticking to his beliefs while his beloved legal system suffers more abuse than Tonto’s dead crow, and the Lone Ranger is born. While his superhero counterparts may concern themselves with saving the world, the Lone Ranger wants to serve justice in a land where the law is increasingly bent for a powerful few – a Lockean nightmare, and perhaps a more terrifying situation than could be concocted by Zod, Kahn or any other maniacal villain du jour.

We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus