What's Hot
What's Going On


Search thousands of events in our database.


Search hundreds of restaurants in our database.


Search hundreds of clubs in our database.


OW on Twitter
OW on Facebook
Print Email

Arts & Culture

At last weekend’s Playfest, Lee Blessing offered seven rules of success for playwrights

Live Active Cultures

Photo: Photo by Seth Kubersky, License: N/A

Photo by Seth Kubersky

I want to begin by thanking playwright Lee Blessing for basically writing my column for me this week. The Tony-, Olivier- and Pulitzer-nominated author of A Walk in the Woods and Eleemosynary visited Orlando Shakes last weekend for a reading of his latest script, For the Loyal, as part of Playfest! Harriett’s New Play Series. (That would be local patroness of the arts Harriett Lake, of course.) Before the reading – which featured Sophie Bell, Rus Blackwell and Riley Clermont in a dark fantasia inspired by the Penn State/Jerry Sandusky scandal – Blessing presented the festival keynote speech, a riotously sharp and self-deprecating address directed at fellow potential playwrights in the audience. Here’s a sampling from Blessing’s seven “exhortations and admonitions” to emerging authors in the “amiable slaughterhouse [of] more disappointments than successes” that is the world of theater.

You have the right to remain silent.

It’s tempting for church-mouse-poor playwrights to take every commission that comes along or even write for free. But as a self-employed contractor, you’re better off working on something “more solid, more central to your development as an artist” than working for others, “no matter how sympathetic or supportive they might be.” Also, don’t wear out your play on the “merry-go-round” of public readings, which can “potentially waste years of your creative life.” (So says the man whose latest play just had its fourth reading this year.)

You have the right to be aesthetically ambitious.

Comparing a “good play” (like A.R. Gurney’s Sylvia) to a “great play” (like Edward Albee’s The Goat or Who Is Sylvia?), Blessing advises “swinging for the fences” and deciding whether to “challenge audiences or simply cater to them” before our society forgets the difference between “a good play and one that is merely good enough.”

You do not have the right to an attorney.

The New York Times is the only critical judge that matters anymore, so “when the New York Times informs you that you no longer have a career, it’s not personal” but “there is no such thing as your day in court.” With an institutional incentive to rarely reverse itself or reassess past opinions, every NYT-reviewed show must “click or close … be flowers or weeds, with no in-between.” So “when the Times tolls for thee [as it did for Blessing with Frank Rich’s tepid 1988 critique of his otherwise-lauded A Walk in the Woods] be sure to have a backup plan.”

Listen to horrible people.

Blessing recalled how he hamstrung the commercial potential of A Walk in the Woods by turning down Alec Guinness’ offer to star on Broadway out of loyalty to director Des McAnuff, against the advice of a shady business associate he described as a “horrible person.” It turns out the shyster was the only one with Blessing’s financial interests at heart; by ignoring him, Lee only earned Obi-Wan’s disdain while losing McAnuff’s friendship anyway.

Be rich.

We welcome user discussion on our site, under the following guidelines:

To comment you must first create a profile and sign-in with a verified DISQUS account or social network ID. Sign up here.

Comments in violation of the rules will be denied, and repeat violators will be banned. Please help police the community by flagging offensive comments for our moderators to review. By posting a comment, you agree to our full terms and conditions. Click here to read terms and conditions.
comments powered by Disqus